Who's a naughty journalist.
Visordown journalist caught at 160
Posts 14 | Views 435
Oh fuck it......
Good lad!!!!!!!!!! " />
If going at a speed anywhere near this is just so unbelievably dangerous, why didn't the filth pull him over right away, instead of letting him carry on in this fashion for miles and miles?
(Answer = it was obvious that he knew what he was doing, and the pig wanted more evidence, and get some fun out of it at the same time.)
Add to that, this 'unmarked' pig-bike would have been encouraging the rider, since they appeared to be coming along for a blast too.
like flyer says
SO Once again.....
.....It's ok for the pigs to travel at this speed in order to secure a conviction but not a man who rides bikes for a living and is obviously a good rider, no he is a menace and a severe danger to the Public.
But the copper is as safe as houses at any speed because he's a copper.........never in my life have i heard so much shit come out in one sentence, the pigs are just as much at risk as anyone else, when will these commentators of speed awareness groups realise that speed on its own is not a killer, because if that were true most of Europe would be dead by now with autobahns and the like.
Shut up, just shut up and stop talking bullshit we the public don't believe you and never have, we certainly would not believe a spokesperson for the pigs especially when he is in charge of them.
Have you ever noticed that the Police are very clever at using words to describe someone breaking the law? Speeding biker (because he felt like it or was in a rush) no, by god no. The Police will say Dangerous biker who endangers lives with Reckless Behavior and Irresponsible and other such like words....the reason....simple to con the public into thinking what the Police want them to think, that everything the Police say id right and everyone else is wrong....Guess what....we stopped believing that as well a long time ago." /> Rant over.........................calm, calm
was very little on the road, and I would of thought the cop car behind would of caused more damage than the bike if they'd lost control. Some of the comments underneath are un-fu**ing believable, then I noticed it was the Mails website " />
Thought the feds were..
there to prevent crime?So why use unmarked vehicles when nothing slows traffic down more than a highly visible orange and white car/bike with blue lights and police written on it?Nothing to do with bonus points for plod and large sums of money for the goverment is it?
The only mistake I could see was he took off without looking in his mirror! If you don't recognise who is following then let them lead.....apart from that cracking bit of riding well controlled obviously skilled.
'WHO CARES WE NEVER WIN...........'
BaldE35: letting them lead
Thing is mate, even if you let the unmarked pig lead, you could still get done. Chances are the miserable, sneaky bastard has rear-facing cameras too and they'll provide evidence of your "crime".
Hey slow learner just use a bit of logic and you might just find the answer.....
'WHO CARES WE NEVER WIN...........'
**Good on him. **
All I can say is good on him for pleading guilty and accepting what he did and taking it on the chin. Unlike all the other people who seem to have an inability to accept when they are in the wrong and they start kicking off like spoilt little kids saying such things as: The cop followed me for too long and they egged me on its all the fault of the police. Get a grip children. His riding was fast, not dangerous, hence he plead guilty to careless driving not dangerous but it was well in excess of the speed limit and he accepted that. It really makes me laugh when people almost say how dare the police catch us breaking the law.
Well done to the magistrate
I think that is a fair and reasonable punishment for being caught doing 160mph on the Queen's highway. I hate seeing people get sent down for speeding.
Its not about....
.....denying the fact that you were speeding, I think what the posts are saying is, why is it ok for the Police to travel at those speeds for the full duration instead of pulling the biker up at the earliest opportunity to save any further problems or accidents, how is it Careless driving for one bike but not so for the other?
If you can answer that one hand on heart, i will be well impressed.